How many individuals did you observe?
Observation | Count |
---|---|
1 | |
12 | |
5 | |
1 | |
1 | |
3 | |
1 | |
WhatChimney Swift (Chaetura pelagica)ObserverjoebartokDescriptionAccompanied by a second Chimney Swift. |
2 |
WhatBarred Fire Salamander (Salamandra salamandra ssp. terrestris)ObserverpfefferliDescriptionÜberfahren |
|
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
4 | |
Photos / SoundsWhatLong-tailed Pea Blue (Lampides boeticus)ObservermanggetotokPlace2XMC+MMR Bendungan Paneki II, Loru, Kec. Sigi Biromaru, Kabupaten Sigi, Sulawesi Tengah 94232, Indonesia (Google, OSM) |
|
Photos / SoundsWhatCaleta rhodeObservermanggetotokPlace2XG4+28C, Pombewe, Kec. Sigi Biromaru, Kabupaten Sigi, Sulawesi Tengah 94364, Indonesia (Google, OSM) |
|
1 | |
1 |
@loarie: I sent a message to the other "count" field creator, but they appear to be no longer active.
In some cases the system doesn't recognise there are two different fields by the same name, eg if you click on "View more search options" above you get taken to
"http://inaturalist.org/observations?field%3Acount="
If you do the same from the other "count" field you get taken to exactly the same (ie wrong) page.
So could you change the single project (mt-diablo-morgan-fire-2013) that is using the lowercase "count" field, to using this one, then we can merge the fields?
I have proposed merging the field "count" with this field "Count"
http://inaturalist.org/observation_fields/751
does anyone have any objection?