Is the occurence of organism in built environment in this specific case based on planning, or is it spontaneous/unintended (in any of neutral/negative/positive sense) or based on deterioration (breaking of structures).
Observation | Rewilding |
---|---|
natural | |
deterioration | |
natural | |
deterioration | |
unknown | |
deterioration | |
deterioration | |
Photos / SoundsWhatFieldfare (Turdus pilaris)ObserverkaupunkilinnutDescription[1] Surrogate nest placed in a tree 2 m high. (Could have been deeper but has few firm sticks to avoid falling most of the area.) [2-3] Treetop fell in a wind and thrush nest just above the breaking point around 5 m. [4-5] Adult reaction after incident. [6-9] Five nestlings under tree. After placing nestlings in replacement nest [1]. [10-11] Adult moving around replacement nest 1-2 m away. [12-14] Adult searching for new food afterwards. Didn't see visiting the nest bust parents stayed at site and in last picture carries worm. UPDATE: Found dead day after. |
natural |
Photos / SoundsWhatFieldfare (Turdus pilaris)ObserverkaupunkilinnutDescriptionFailed nesting, nestlings found dead in exactly same position left yesterday. Surrogate nest not accepted or nestlings were not healthy after fall. No sight of adults, apparently abandoned the site, other birds active around. |
natural |
spontaneous | |
spontaneous | |
spontaneous | |
deterioration | |
spontaneous | |
deterioration | |
spontaneous | |
deterioration | |
spontaneous | |
spontaneous | |
spontaneous | |
spontaneous | |
spontaneous | |
spontaneous | |
spontaneous | |
spontaneous | |
spontaneous | |
spontaneous | |
spontaneous | |
spontaneous | |
spontaneous |
For further details, see https://www.inaturalist.org/posts/94437-observation-field-rewilding