@ctmdb in the future please don't swap Species e.g. Cathaica fasciola into Complexes e.g. Cathaica fasciola if the Species is still a valid taxon (e.g. Cathaica fasciola). Better to create the complex and regraft the existing Species Cathaica fasciola to it
I know its a pain, but that should be done through adding new Ids, taxon changes should be used to reshape the tree but not to replace IDs if the nodes (e.g. species Cathaica fasciola) -
Unintended disagreements occur when a parent (B) is
thinned by swapping a child (E) to another part of the
taxonomic tree, resulting in existing IDs of the parent being interpreted
as disagreements with existing IDs of the swapped child.
Identification
ID 2 of taxon E will be an unintended disagreement with ID 1 of taxon B after the taxon swap
If thinning a parent results in more than 10 unintended disagreements, you
should split the parent after swapping the child to replace existing IDs
of the parent (B) with IDs that don't disagree.
@ctmdb in the future please don't swap Species e.g. Cathaica fasciola into Complexes e.g. Cathaica fasciola if the Species is still a valid taxon (e.g. Cathaica fasciola). Better to create the complex and regraft the existing Species Cathaica fasciola to it