Heads up: Some or all of the identifications affected by
this split may have been replaced with identifications of Coeligena. This
happens when we can't automatically assign an identification to one of the
output taxa.
Review identifications of Coeligena torquata 6214
Collared Inca is split into three species. These splits are based in part on substantial plumage differences; also, although there is not yet data for all members of this group of this group, genetic analyses indicate that some taxa (the torquata Group and the inca/omissa Group) are more differentiated than are many other taxa of Coeligena that are recognized as species (McGuire et al. 2014). The three newly recognized species are Collared Inca Coeligena torquata, including subspecies torquata, fulgidigula, margaretae, insectivora, and eisenmanni; a monotypic Green Inca Coeligena conradii; and Gould's Inca Coeligena inca, with subspecies omissa and inca.
@loarie Does this look good? Everything is atlased, and ranges have been updated. I'm a little bit hesitant to commit though because I guess even post-split, these three species have a good chunk of sympatry between them so I guess obs in those regions will just get bumped to genus.
Unintended disagreements occur when a parent (B) is
thinned by swapping a child (E) to another part of the
taxonomic tree, resulting in existing IDs of the parent being interpreted
as disagreements with existing IDs of the swapped child.
Identification
ID 2 of taxon E will be an unintended disagreement with ID 1 of taxon B after the taxon swap
If thinning a parent results in more than 10 unintended disagreements, you
should split the parent after swapping the child to replace existing IDs
of the parent (B) with IDs that don't disagree.
@loarie Does this look good? Everything is atlased, and ranges have been updated. I'm a little bit hesitant to commit though because I guess even post-split, these three species have a good chunk of sympatry between them so I guess obs in those regions will just get bumped to genus.