I was just about to make this change but see you've set it up, Nick. Any reason not to commit it? ITIS agrees, by the way.
I'll proceed with adding subspecific names under O. cespitosa and merging the O. caespitosa subspecific names with them. (I initially considered simply dropping them, but will keep for historical purposes - and so they can't be added back.)
Unintended disagreements occur when a parent (B) is
thinned by swapping a child (E) to another part of the
taxonomic tree, resulting in existing IDs of the parent being interpreted
as disagreements with existing IDs of the swapped child.
Identification
ID 2 of taxon E will be an unintended disagreement with ID 1 of taxon B after the taxon swap
If thinning a parent results in more than 10 unintended disagreements, you
should split the parent after swapping the child to replace existing IDs
of the parent (B) with IDs that don't disagree.
I was just about to make this change but see you've set it up, Nick. Any reason not to commit it? ITIS agrees, by the way.
I'll proceed with adding subspecific names under O. cespitosa and merging the O. caespitosa subspecific names with them. (I initially considered simply dropping them, but will keep for historical purposes - and so they can't be added back.)