Heads up: Some or all of the identifications affected by
this split may have been replaced with identifications of Psittacara. This
happens when we can't automatically assign an identification to one of the
output taxa.
Review identifications of Psittacara holochlorus 367566
Clements, J. F., T. S. Schulenberg, M. J. Iliff, D. Roberson, T. A. Fredericks, B. L. Sullivan, and C. L. Wood. 2019. The eBird/Clements checklist of birds of the world: v2019. Downloaded from http://www.birds.cornell.edu/clementschecklist/download/ (Link)
Is there a reason why so many mainland observations are being updated to genus level instead of the new Psittacara holochlorus taxon? I'd think the geographic assignment here would be fairly straightforward.
Unintended disagreements occur when a parent (B) is
thinned by swapping a child (E) to another part of the
taxonomic tree, resulting in existing IDs of the parent being interpreted
as disagreements with existing IDs of the swapped child.
Identification
ID 2 of taxon E will be an unintended disagreement with ID 1 of taxon B after the taxon swap
If thinning a parent results in more than 10 unintended disagreements, you
should split the parent after swapping the child to replace existing IDs
of the parent (B) with IDs that don't disagree.
Is there a reason why so many mainland observations are being updated to genus level instead of the new Psittacara holochlorus taxon? I'd think the geographic assignment here would be fairly straightforward.